RomanceAustralia about the critiquing process — what to talk about when you're past the beginner stage. Any suggestions?
The hardest part of the critique process comes after the beginner level is past. Often people are at a loss when they read someone’s work, especially if problems are few and far between. What if there are no typos, no grammar mistakes, no head hopping, no obvious problems? Where do you go then?
I think one of the most important things is to respond to a piece, not correct it.
Read the rest of the post here.